Friday, September 20, 2013


VACANCY

Applications are invited from suitably qualified persons to fill the position of Project Coordinator - Guyana Social Change Project within the Society Against Sexual Orientation Discrimination.

The Project Coordinator will be responsible for:    
  • Coordinating all activities under the project and ensuring established deadlines are met.
  • Preparing a work plan for project activities in accordance with the project timeline. 
  • Monitoring the implementation of project activities and preparing project reports as required.
  • Ensuring adherence to the accounting and financial requirements of the project.
  • Conducting research on issues to support SASOD’s work around the project’s goals.
  • Preparing monthly project reports in the specified format. 
  • Managing engagements with stakeholders including political leaders, media, government agencies, private sector partners, trade unions, civil society groups and other agents. 
  • Organizing meetings, workshops and other public events as required for the implementation of the project and furtherance of SASOD’s objectives.
  • Organizing advocacy related initiatives including identifying and setting up meetings with key stake-holders and decision makers in the political, social, faith and other sectors. 
  • Providing support for partner and stakeholder activities through solidarity actions, technical support, participation and other actions which promote SASOD’s visibility.


Qualifications and Experience 

At least a Bachelor’s Degree from an accredited university in Communication, English, Management, Social Sciences or other relevant discipline.
Substantial professional and/or volunteer experience in areas relevant to advocacy and communication is essential, including but not limited to, public communications, customer service, media, public relations, marketing, civic organizing, etc. 

Suitable candidates should send a resume, accompanied by a cover letter and a separate statement of approximately 300 words sharing their personal views on LGBT rights in Guyana to coordinator@sasod.org.gy copied to sasod@sasod.org.gy no later than 13:00 hrs on Friday, September 27, 2013.

To request Terms of Reference please send email to: sasod_admin@sasod.org.gy

Sunday, September 08, 2013

Constitutional Court Rules Cross-Dressing is Not a Crime if Not for “Improper Purpose”

Joint Media Release from the Society Against Sexual Orientation Discrimination (SASOD), Guyana Trans United (GTU), Caribbean Vulnerable Communities Coalition (CVC), Caribbean Forum for Liberation and Acceptance of Genders and Sexualities (CariFLAGS) and the Faculty of Law University of the West Indies Rights Advocacy Project (U-RAP)

Constitutional Court Rules Cross-Dressing is Not a Crime if Not for “Improper Purpose”     
- Rights Groups Plan Appeal on Dubious Decision

Georgetown, Guyana

On Friday afternoon, September 6, 2013, the Honourable Chief Justice (Ag.), Mr. Ian Chang delivered his judgment in Quincy McEwan, Seon Clarke, Joseph Fraser, Seyon Persaud and the Society Against Sexual Orientation Discrimination (SASOD)   vs. Attorney General of Guyana. Section 153(1)(xlvii) of the Summary Jurisdiction (Offences) provision makes a criminal offence of a man wearing female attire, and a woman wearing male attire, publicly, for any improper purpose. The Chief Justice said that cross-dressing in a public place is an offence only if it is done for an improper purpose.

The Chief Justice also found that the police violated the human rights of the four litigants in the case during their crackdown in February 2009 when they arrested them under section 153(1)(xlvii) of the Summary Jurisdiction (Offences) Act and he awarded each of the four arrested compensation of $40,000 (GYD) for breach of their rights to be informed as soon as reasonably practicable as to the reason(s) for their arrests under Article 139 (3) of the Guyana Constitution.

Chief Justice Chang also decided that section 153 (1) (xlvii) of the Summary Jurisdiction (Offences) Act, is immune from the constitutional challenge brought by the four transgender litigants and their supporting organisations. As an 1893 law, pre-dating Guyana’s independence, the Chief Justice said “legislative rather than curial action is necessary to invalidate the provision.y to invalidate the provision”.” The litigants are preparing to appeal this and other aspects of Friday’s court decision. 

Colin Robinson, manager of the CariFLAGS secretariat based in Trinidad, praised the court’s finding that “It is not criminally offensive for a person to wear the attire of the opposite sex as a matter of preference or to give expression to or to reflect his or her sexual orientation.” The court also found that the law applies only to “attire” and not other gendered accoutrements such as head wigs, ear rings or even shoes. “The learned Chief Justice, however, has confused sexual orientation with gender identity,” Robinson commented.

Reacting to the judgment, the first-named applicant, Quincy McEwan, better known as Gulliver, who is also the Director of Guyana Trans United (GTU), noted that, “The Chief Justice was relatively clear that once you are expressing your gender identity, it’s not criminal for a man to wear female attire. But the law really stifles us, because what could be an improper purpose? The trans community is very worried, and still fearful of arrests, in light of this decision.” The court did not clarify what improper purposes gave rise to the arrests in this case.

The Chief Justice was not convinced the cross-dressing law amounted to ‘discrimination’ on the basis of gender, which would have been in violation of the Guyana Constitution. The court also ruled that the prohibition in the 1893 law is against persons of both genders for the same conduct and, as such, does not amount to discrimination based on gender. Se-shauna Wheatle is Jamaican and Lecturer in Law at Exeter College at the University of Oxford and a researcher in the fields of comparative human rights law and comparative constitutional law. Wheatle, who is the author of the 2013 report “Adjudication in Homicide Cases involving Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Persons in the Commonwealth Caribbean,” said that “The constitutional moment presented by this case demanded more detailed assessment of the issue of discrimination against transgender persons.” She observed that “The reasoning of the learned judge omitted any discussion of the prescription of gender roles to individuals according to their sex and the consequent requirement that individuals dress according to those prescribed gender roles. There was no discussion of the way in which the challenged section reflected such prescription of gender roles or the impact of this dynamic on persons who are transgender.”

The court also ruled that SASOD had no locus standi (standing) in the matter since the individual applicants brought the claim in their own names as the persons who were personally aggrieved. The Guyana Constitution was the first in the English-speaking Caribbean to give “an association acting on behalf of its members” the right to bring a claim before the Constitutional Court that there has been a breach of the guaranteed fundamental rights. The standing of SASOD is one of the issues which the litigants expect to argue before the Court of Appeal.

Similar sentiments were echoed by Zenita Nicholson, Secretary of SASOD’s board of trustees. “I feel the court lost a golden opportunity to give life to the Guyana constitution by vitiating this 1893 law against cross-dressing and establishing that all Guyanese are entitled to fundamental rights and freedoms, including our transgender citizens, who unfortunately will continue to be vulnerable to human rights abuses, with this dubious decision. We must appeal it,” she said.  

Dr. Arif Bulkan who argued the case on behalf of the litigants is a lecturer in constitutional law and human rights law at the Faculty of Law, UWI, St. Augustine and a coordinator of the Faculty of Law UWI Rights Advocacy Project (U-RAP), which has managed the litigation. Dr. Bulkan said that “This case raises issues of great public and constitutional importance relating to the scope of the restrictive savings law clauses in the Constitution that limit challenges to repressive colonial laws and the new provisions in the Guyana Constitution dealing with equality and non-discrimination. The region is closely watching this case.” He added that the legal team for the litigants, which includes Mr. Gino Persaud as instructing counsel, looks forward to arguing these important human rights concerns before the Court of Appeal. He said “In the content of our laws and details of our conduct, we must give meaning to the strong commitment in the Constitution to eliminate ‘any and every form of discrimination’ in Guyana.”

The case of McEwan, Clarke, Fraser, Persaud and SASOD v. Attorney General was initiated four years ago following the February 2009 conviction and fine of seven individuals for violating section 153 (1) (xlvii) of the Summary Jurisdiction (Offences) Act. The 1893 law makes it a criminal offence for men to wear female attire and for women to wear male attire “in any public way or public place, for any improper purpose.” Other activities criminalised in section 153(1) are: grooming an animal in a public place; placing goods in a public way in town; beating a mat in a public way; flying a kite in the city; loitering around a shop and hauling timber in a public way. Unrepresented and unaware of their rights, the defendants were detained in police custody over the weekend, and then hustled through the legal system and fined $7,500 (GYD) each.  

U-RAP co-founder, attorney-at-law and public law lecturer at the University of the West Indies (UWI), St. Augustine, Dr. Arif Bulkan explained that this colonial law was part of repressive penal regimes instituted in the second half of the nineteenth century throughout the Caribbean to severely constrain the lives and actions of recent freed Africans and the newly arrived indentured servants. Bulkan notes that “Despite the discriminatory aspects of these colonial laws, and their low regard for the majority colonial populations, vagrancy laws like section 153(1) have been kept in effect long after independence.” He adds that "The law is plainly at odds with the Guyana Constitution which states that it is committed to 'eliminating every form of discrimination.'”
---


Hon. Mr. Justice Ian Chang – Chief Justice (Ag.) [Photo Credit: Stabroek News] 


Notes to editors

SASOD is a local human rights organization working to promote equality and justice for all Guyanese, and is particularly focused on eliminating discrimination based on sexuality, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression in Guyana.

GTU is a local transgender group working to empower the Guyanese trans community, advocate for their human rights and participate as equal citizens in decisions which affect their lives.

CVC is a regional coalition of community leaders and non-governmental agencies providing services directly to and on behalf of vulnerable populations who are marginalised and excluded in the Caribbean.

CariFLAGS a 16-year-old lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) Caribbean advocacy network with offices in Castries, Kingston, Port of Spain and Santo Domingo, and affiliate organizations across the region.



U-RAP’s objective is to promote human rights and social justice in the Caribbean by undertaking and participating in human rights litigation in collaboration with human rights lawyers and organisations. The team of lawyers involved in this case includes Gino Persaud, Nigel Hughes and Miles Fitzpatrick, S.C.


Media Spokespersons:

Zenita Nicholson for SASOD: +592 662-8278

Quincy McEwan for GTU: +592 674-8741

Ivan Cruickshank for CVC: +1 876 631-7299

Colin Robinson for CariFLAGS: +1 868 758-7676

Thursday, August 29, 2013

Journalist Leon Suseran comes out as gay
Posted By Staff Writer On August 29, 2013 @ 5:28 am In Local News | No Comments
After years of deliberation, journalist Leon Suseran has decided to come out as gay, saying that he believes that openness is the path to making the country a safe and welcoming place for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) persons.
“Given the current social climate of our society in terms of how persons perceive homosexuals, I have reached a point in my life where I could care less of what people think.
Today, I am living my best life ever and I owe it to myself as well as society out there to come clean as it were,” Suseran, 29, told Stabroek News in an interview.
He stated that while he hopes his coming out would improve the public image of the LGBT community in Guyana,
Leon Suseran
Leon Suseran
he was also unsure if it has a strong enough presence in the public sphere.
“I’m afraid that we cannot classify such a group since many gays and lesbians—as well as bisexuals—are on the down- low and choose not to even be honest with their own selves,” he said, while saying he hoped his coming out could be inspirational for other LGBT youth.
He recalled seeing other gay friends struggle with their sexuality and said it made them miserable. “To mess up people’s lives just—because of the pressures of society, family, even religion? No way! Not worth it. I prefer to be happy and be in charge of my own happiness; not let others be in charge of it for me,” he added.
Suseran also noted that Guyana’s social setting consistently promotes gender norms and a prescribed masculinity for young men. He concluded that ascribing a negative connotation to homosexuality has consistently been used to steer young men into behaving like perceived “real men.”
“You see, a lot of Guyanese males are caught up trying to promote that masculine image to the public.
And rightfully so! If they do not, they will be called homos and sissies by their buddies and society! They will not measure up to what it means to be a man—‘a real man,’” Suseran stated.
He also noted that new derogatory names for gay men, like ‘Chi-Chi man,’ have been invented through the Caribbean lexicon and dialect that springs forth from anti-gay music, such as dancehall, and he questioned the effectiveness of the current gay rights organisations within Guyana.
“I believe there is a gay rights group—if I may even call it that—in Guyana. But who are these people? Who are the members? What are they about?
What are they fighting for? Why do they appear to be in hiding? Surely they too are afraid of being identified with the homosexual community!
This cannot take us anywhere if we are to make Guyana a safe and welcoming place for gays and lesbians,” he said, while noting that he has never reached out to the Society Against Sexual Orientation Discrimination (SASOD), which has been working as an advocacy group since 2003.
As a practising Catholic Suseran acknowledged that the church does not and will never condone homosexual lifestyles and sexual habits. “…But the church has always been a home of both saints and sinners, in the past and very much so in the present. I guess I will have to draw the line of the teachings of the church right there for me,” he said.
He also said that he was ready for the ramifications of coming out. “I am fully aware that persons I know might want to disassociate themselves from me; some will act like they never knew me; others might withdraw their friendship slowly,” he noted, while adding that there are also people throughout Guyana that will support and understand his need to be honest.


URL to article: http://www.stabroeknews.com/2013/news/stories/08/29/journalist-leon-suseran-comes-out-as-gay/

Sunday, August 25, 2013

Consultation on Participatory Governance across the Americas (Caribbean and Canada)





Consultation on Participatory Governance across the Americas (Caribbean and Canada)
Hosted by the Caribbean Policy Development Centre/Commonwealth Foundation
Castries, Saint Lucia
April 16 - 17, 2013


Representative for the Society Against Sexual Orientation Discrimination (SASOD- Guyana): Alana Da Silva
The following were the objectives of the consultation:
1.      To gain a deeper understanding of the expertise, strengths and comparative advantages of existing and potential partners across the Americas (Caribbean and Canada).

2.      To gain a deeper understanding of the issues, gaps, opportunities and leadership in participatory governance across the Americas (Caribbean and Canada).

3.      To  develop a regional snapshot of the MDG acceleration and post 2015 framework building base on research undertaken by the Foundation in the Commonwealth (including the Caribbean).

4.      To facilitate the identification of regional priorities on participatory governance and development.

Day One – April 16, 2013
The consultation was opened at 8:30am by Shantal Munro-Knight, Moderator and Chief Executive Coordinator, Caribbean Policy Development Centre (CPDC) – and subsequent remarks were made by the following persons:

1.         Renrick Rose, Chair – CPDC
Renrick Rose said that, “We are good talkers in the Caribbean…”

However, participatory governance “is a fundamental aspect of democracy and an aspect of civil society… and whatever we come to within these two days, how does it translate in individual response and implementation?”

2.         Shantal Munro-Knight, Executive Coordinator - CPDC
According to Munro-Knight, the Commonwealth Foundation was founded in 1965 and is governed by member states to strengthen the capacity of civil society in the Commonwealth. She also stated that the organization was re-launched in November, 2012 – as it cannot remain in London. Instead, it also needs to hear the voices of the Commonwealth people.

3.         Dr. Anthony George, Senior Policy Analyst, Office of the Prime Minister, Saint Lucia
According to Dr. Anthony George, the year “2013 is characterized by changes and diversity…”
“We also acknowledge that power, wealth and status are inequitably distributed... and the government of Saint Lucia supports active and inclusive participation of civil society, even in the advocacy of human rights…” Therefore, “Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) cannot be achieved without the active participation of Civil Society Organisations…” He also said, “You can hold governments and institutions responsible” for human rights violations. Furthermore, “The cost of inaction will likely to be high, and the longer the inaction on your part, the higher the cost will be.”
Dr. George also said that, there is a need to “encourage partnerships and networking” as an integral part of building the capacity of civil society across the region and to protect human rights and equality.  

4.         Amy Bartlett, Programme Coordinator, Canadian Council for International Cooperation
Amy Bartlett issued a reminder to participants that, “The Canadian Development Agency (CIDA) is gone… and Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) have little or no influence and funding for development” in Canada. Therefore, it is critical for CSOs to seek innovative ways to build and strengthen partnerships; connect and share ideas and experiences; and to remain active in resolving humanitarian issues affecting their region and the global environment.

Working Session 1
Four (4) working groups were facilitated to discuss what is participatory governance, its elements, level of CSO and non-state actors’ (NSAs) influence on development at the governmental level, and their outcomes.

Working Session 2
Four (4) working groups discussed the various opportunities, strengths, and weaknesses of participatory governance in the region and at the national level; and how these issues can translate into meaningful and sustained collaboration between civil society, NSAs and the public sector, in order to create positive human development at all levels.

Working Session 3
Three (3) working groups were facilitated to discuss some of the most important regional priorities in achieving participatory governance, inclusiveness, and partnerships between NGOs, CSOs, and governments, as well as international donors and organisations.

Evening Working Session – April 16, 2013 at 7:30pm to 9:30PM
Panel Discussion on “The Social Conjecture: Social Movements! Social Media & Individual Resistance: Whither the organized NGO Movement?”

Panelists:
Ms. Maribel Gonzalez, Manager – Programme Development, Development Workshop
Mr. Cecil Ryan, Managing Director, Project Promotion Ltd.
Ms. Judith Wedderburn, Director, Freidich Ebert Stiftung
Mr. Giles Romulus, National Coordinator, GEF SGP UNDP (Saint Lucia)

There was a general consensus among the panelists and participants that, social media is a tool as well as a space that should be effectively, efficiently, and strategically managed by CSOs, NGOs and other NSAs to create awareness, advocate, and to interact with their constituents and other organisations throughout the region and internationally. There should be no barrier to this free movement and communication.
Emphasis was also placed on engaging youth in advocacy and adapting to changes in social media in order to build a larger audience and to collaborate at various levels and platforms. However, according to the panelists, social media should never be used as a substitute for organising and coordinating activities at local and grass-roots levels. Instead, these two must work in unity in order to effect changes in the lives of groups and individuals throughout our countries and regions.
Day Two - April 17, 2013
Three working groups were facilitated throughout the day to discuss the findings of the regional MDGs review, identify loopholes in the process, and propose recommendations for implementation of the post- 2015 framework – and in particular, the opportunities for building equitable relations between governments, CSOs, and NSAs.

Outcomes
Culminating from the working groups, it was agreed that while there are many limitations for CSOs and NSAs to engage the government in meaningful discussions to effect policies at the national level, human rights organisations also have a responsibility to organize themselves into an official body that can collectively advocate on behalf of each member, which should also include supporting human rights initiatives within each country, across the region, and internationally.
It was also agreed that CSOs must engage regularly in self-analysis and introspection in order to maintain a collective vision of how to proceed with the work of advocacy, and to remember that the fight is for “human rights,” and it is a personal and lifelong struggle that requires dedication, commitment, and many times, voluntary work.

Post – 2015 Regional Priorities, Processes, and Activities

The regional priority areas below were agreed upon by all participants of the consultation and will serve as a proposal by the CPDC for drafting the main focus of the post-2015 regional framework agenda. As such, the target groups for addressing these areas of development were listed as: Women and girls; children; LGBTI people; People Living with HIV (PLHIV); People with disabilities (PWD); Men; Immigrants (Re: Human Trafficking); and Youth.

1.      Human Development, Poverty Reduction, and Economic Empowerment.

2.      Governance, Citizen Participation, and Inclusiveness.

3.      Environmental Development and Sustainability.

4.      Gender and Women’s Empowerment.

5.   Social Development (Equity and Justice), including the Eradication and prevention of discrimination against marginalized groups.

6.      Promotion of entrepreneurships (for youth).

In closing, the CPDC provided a list of their immediate priorities, following the consultation – some of which have already been realized subsequent to this meeting. These included:
§  Incorporating this agenda into regional spaces (like CARICOM, etc.)
§  Dissemination of the agreed outcomes of the consultation.
§  Setup working groups to structure the framework for continued consultations and collaboration with regional partners, NGOs, CSOs and other NSAs.
§  Work at global level to increase collaboration between international donors/organisations and CSOs.
§  Issue a full report of the workshop within two (2) weeks from the closing date (April 17, 2013).