(Georgetown,
Guyana) The Court of Appeal today in an oral decision delivered by the
acting Chancellor, the Honourable Carl Singh, confirmed the ruling of
the then acting Chief Justice Ian Chang in the High Court that the
expression of one’s gender identity as a trans person is not in and of
itself a crime. However, the Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed the
appeal, rejecting the appellants’ arguments that the law in question
discriminates based on gender and violates multiple equality provisions
in the Constitution. The appellants confirmed that they intend to appeal
this ruling to the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ).
In
2010 four trans women and one of Guyana’s lesbian, gay, bisexual and
transgender (LGBT) organisations brought an action challenging the
constitutionality of an 1893 colonial vagrancy law found in the Summary
Jurisdiction (Offences) Act which makes it an offence for a ‘man’ or a
‘woman’ to cross-dress in public ‘for any improper purpose’. The essence
of the case brought by Gulliver McEwan, Angel Clarke, Peaches Fraser
and Isabella Persaud and the Society Against Sexual Orientation
Discrimination (SASOD) was that this 19th century vagrancy law is
hopeless vague, amounts to sex/gender discrimination because it is based
on sex-role stereotyping and has a disproportionate impact on trans
persons.