|
Twinkle, Transgender Activist & Member of GTU |
March
31, 2016 (Georgetown, Guyana) Transgender persons in Guyana face grave
levels of discrimination, harassment and humiliation and social
exclusion in their daily lives. On Transgender Day of Visibility, the
Guyana Trans United (GTU), Society Against Sexual Orientation
Discrimination (SASOD) and the UWI Faculty of Law Rights Advocacy
Project (U-RAP) call attention to the fundamental principle affirmed in
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that ‘all human beings are
born free and equal in dignity and rights’.
It
is the duty of judges to respect a person’s gender identity, consistent
with the Constitution of Guyana which guarantees that ‘the State shall
not deny to any person equality before the law or equal protection and
benefit of the law’, universal principles of equality and
non-discrimination under international law and regional and
international standards of judicial conduct.
During
the course of March 2016, in at least three separate incidents in the
Magistrates Courts, transgender women have been prohibited by sitting
Magistrates from attending court or appearing before the court in
matters that relate to them because they have been dressed as women.
In one instance, Magistrate Dylon Bess in Georgetown alluded to section 153(xlvii) of the Summary Jurisdiction (Offences) Act
which makes it an offence for any person who, ‘being a man in any
public place or way, for an improper purpose, appears in female attire’.
Magistrate Bess said that the law had not changed and that the
defendant would not be permitted to be remain in his courtroom to answer
the charges dressed as a woman.
Contrary
to the Magistrate Bess’ assertions, the laws of Guyana do not prohibit a
trans woman from attending court dressed as a woman. This was
explicitly confirmed by the then Honourable Chief Justice, Mr. Justice
Chang, in his 2013 decision in the challenge to the constitutionality of
section 153(xlvii), the case of McEwan and others v The Attorney General.
Individual members of GTU and SASOD as an organisation are the
applicants in that case which has been appealed and is awaiting a date
for a hearing before the Court of Appeal.