To
commemorate the International Transgender Day of Visibility 2016
observed on March 31 just a few days ago, the Guyana Trans United (GTU)
and the Society Against Sexual Orientation Discrimination (SASOD) held a
special media engagement which lead into a “Brunch Talk” forum to
discuss the recent case where a male-to-female transgender person,
Twinkle, was barred from attending matters in the Georgetown court by
Magistrate Dylon Bess for “cross-dressing” by presenting herself in
female attire.
Justice delayed is Justice Denied
Twinkle
spoke of her experiences from the incident to the actual court hearing.
GTU member Twinkle talked about transphobic hate crimes perpetuated
against her. In this particular instance, she was attacked by a man
because of her gender identity. After being hit in the head with a glass
bottle, Twinkle defended herself against the man which caused him
bodily harm and he reported this to the police. She reported that the
police did not take any reports from her and although she was physically
harmed, no medical report was facilitated. “The police didn’t treat me
as a matter of concern. They didn’t ask for a medical or anything
because they said they didn’t see any injuries but the man got taken
care of,” Twinkle said.
At
the court hearing, Magistrate Dylon Bess who presided refused to even
acknowledge the case, asking Twinkle to change her clothing before she
could present herself to his court. “I had to be rebellious. I don’t
think the case mattered on how I’m dressed as a trans-woman.” Twinkle
was fully dressed in female attire. “I wouldn’t change for a magistrate.
I respect the Magistrate for his position as someone in the law and the
Magistrate should respect me as a human being expressing my true
identity.”
Even
the Prosecutor warned Twinkle about how she presents in court stating
that she, Twinkle, has little respect for the Court and if she was in
America (The United States of) she was going to be locked up. Aside from
being barred from the courtroom it was the Prosecutor that informed
Twinkle that the Magistrate will not even listen to the case, despite
that there were allegations were brought against her to defend. The case
was subsequently dismissed while there were police officers guarding
the gates to the Court to prevent Twinkle and other GTU members from
entering the premises.
GTU along with other supporters from civil society began to protest outside the Georgetown ruled in 2013 that cross-dressing is not a crime unless done for an “improper purpose.” The term “improper purpose” was never defined by the court which leaves it subjective, and a weapon for discrimination with little protection from the law, as in Twinkle’s case.
“Show me the “improper purpose” in going to court,” Twinkle argued.
No comments:
Post a Comment